<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comentarii pentru: Pacatul</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bezdomny.wordpress.com/2009/04/03/pacatul/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bezdomny.wordpress.com/2009/04/03/pacatul/</link>
	<description>Crazy mof'cker with a soft spot for Devils</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:02:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>de: deroude</title>
		<link>http://bezdomny.wordpress.com/2009/04/03/pacatul/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>deroude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 07:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bezdomny.wordpress.com/?p=316#comment-394</guid>
		<description>True, Ma&#039;am!

... dar cu cateva amendamente: - I&#039;m not a stranger :) , because you&#039;re always welcome; nu am vrut sa aduc in discutie pariul lui Pascal, deoarece este in esenta un sofism. Credinta nu poate fi o alegere rationala, declarativa. Tocmai de aceea nu mi-am pus problema motivatiei de a crede, ci a motivatiei de a pacatui. 

O discutie este interesanta daca ea persista chiar si dupa ce focul vesnic a schimbat (sau a confirmat) perspectivele interlocutorilor originali. De aceea citim de exemplu inca dialogurile platonice.

Presupun ca daca afirm ca prefer oricand un credincios autentic unui pacatos ipocrit sau ignorant, asta reprezinta o tautologie, nu ? :D Oricum, asta inseamna ca preferi varianta lui Kierkegaard - opusul pacatului este credinta. Insa, in termeni de preferinte, s-ar putea sa fie mai interesant prin cate ispite ai trecut si cu cata credinta ai ramas.

Who&#039;s blogless? Aw, the darn crisis... Maybe we can put a roof above his or her keyboard? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, Ma&#8217;am!</p>
<p>&#8230; dar cu cateva amendamente: &#8211; I&#8217;m not a stranger <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  , because you&#8217;re always welcome; nu am vrut sa aduc in discutie pariul lui Pascal, deoarece este in esenta un sofism. Credinta nu poate fi o alegere rationala, declarativa. Tocmai de aceea nu mi-am pus problema motivatiei de a crede, ci a motivatiei de a pacatui. </p>
<p>O discutie este interesanta daca ea persista chiar si dupa ce focul vesnic a schimbat (sau a confirmat) perspectivele interlocutorilor originali. De aceea citim de exemplu inca dialogurile platonice.</p>
<p>Presupun ca daca afirm ca prefer oricand un credincios autentic unui pacatos ipocrit sau ignorant, asta reprezinta o tautologie, nu ? <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  Oricum, asta inseamna ca preferi varianta lui Kierkegaard &#8211; opusul pacatului este credinta. Insa, in termeni de preferinte, s-ar putea sa fie mai interesant prin cate ispite ai trecut si cu cata credinta ai ramas.</p>
<p>Who&#8217;s blogless? Aw, the darn crisis&#8230; Maybe we can put a roof above his or her keyboard? <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>de: windwhisperer</title>
		<link>http://bezdomny.wordpress.com/2009/04/03/pacatul/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>windwhisperer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 22:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bezdomny.wordpress.com/?p=316#comment-393</guid>
		<description>hello , stranger ! :)
 Remember Pascal&#039;s wager  ;)
Focul vesnic o sa-ti schimbe perspectiva  I am kidding. Am mai spus asta cuiva care acum e “blogless”  : prefer oricand un pacatos autentic unui credincios ipocrit sau ignorant. Anytime, anywhere, always.
  tc, j.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello , stranger ! <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
 Remember Pascal&#8217;s wager  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Focul vesnic o sa-ti schimbe perspectiva  I am kidding. Am mai spus asta cuiva care acum e “blogless”  : prefer oricand un pacatos autentic unui credincios ipocrit sau ignorant. Anytime, anywhere, always.<br />
  tc, j.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>de: theMKL</title>
		<link>http://bezdomny.wordpress.com/2009/04/03/pacatul/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>theMKL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 08:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bezdomny.wordpress.com/?p=316#comment-378</guid>
		<description>Chiar ca te papa in poponetz !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chiar ca te papa in poponetz !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
